Advertisement

Want vs wont

  • Want and wont are commonly confused words that are pronounced in the same way but are spelled differently and have different meanings, which makes them homophones. Homophones are a group of words with different spellings, the same pronunciations, and different meanings. Homophones exist because of our ever-changing English language and are a challenge for those who wish to learn to speak English. It can be difficult to learn how to spell different words that sound the same, and homophones are commonly misused words. Said aloud, the difference is less important, because the words are pronounced the same. The way the spelling and definitions differ can be confusing even to native English speakers when attempting to learn vocabulary correctly. Proper pronunciation of spoken English may help the listener distinguish between homophones and understand the correct spelling; the words affect-effect are a good example, but the word pairs to, too and two, bridle and bridal, creek and creak, hoard and horde, toed and towed, or horse and hoarse, are indistinguishable from each other and are easily confused and are commonly misused. Pronunciation is usually more ambiguous, as English pronunciation may vary according to dialect, and English spelling is constantly evolving. Pronunciation may change even though the spelling doesn’t, producing two words that are pronounced in the same manner but have different meanings such as night and knight. Phonological spelling and spelling rules do not always work, and most people avoid misspelling by studying vocabulary words from spelling lists, enhancing their literacy skills through spelling practice, and learning words in English by studying a dictionary of the English language. English words are also spelled according to their etymologies rather than their sound. For instance, the word threw is derived from the Old English word thrawan, and the word through came from the Old English word thurh. Homophones are confusing words and are commonly misspelled words because of the confusion that arises from words that are pronounced alike but have very different usage and etymology. A spell checker will rarely find this type of mistake in English vocabulary, so do not rely on spell check but instead, learn to spell. Even a participant in a spelling bee like the National Spelling Bee will ask for an example of a homophone in a sentence, so that she understands which word she is to spell by using context clues. Homophones are often used in wordplay like puns. We will examine the different meanings of the homophonic words want and wont, the word origins of the terms, and some examples of their English usage in sentences.

     

    Want, when used as a noun, means a lack of something or a desire for something. Want, when used as a verb, means to desire something or to wish for something. In British English, want may mean that something needs attention. Related words are wants, wanted, wanting. The word want is derived from the Old Norse word, vant, which means lacking.

    Advertisement

    Wont describes a usual behavior, a habitual behavior, or to become accustomed to a habitual behavior. Wont may be used as a noun, adjective or verb; related words are wonts, wonted, wonting. Wont comes from the Old English word, gewunod, in the past participle, wunian, which means to dwell or to become accustomed.

    Examples

    A majority of Americans want more U.S. diplomatic engagement and a plurality want fewer U.S. troops stationed abroad, according to a survey taken as the chaotic U.S. evacuation of Afghanistan took place. (Reuters)

    The findings appear to suggest that most voters in Minneapolis want a better or different police department, but not a department with fewer officers. (Minneapolis Star Tribune)

    Instead, Merkel has, in the cloaked and understated way that is her wont, snubbed Biden twice. (Bloomberg)

    As he is wont to do, Russell Wilson took the blame for Sunday’s Seahawks loss in a press conference coiled around his desire for eternal optimism. (Sports Illustrated)


    About Grammarist
    Contact | Privacy policy | Home
    © Copyright 2009-2014 Grammarist