Loose vs. lose

Lose is only a verb. To lose is to suffer a loss, to be deprived of, to part with, or to fail to keep possession of.

Loose is mainly an adjective used to describe things that are not tightly fitted. Where it is a verb, it means to release—for example, they loosed the dogs on the intruders—but the word is only rarely used this way. It also has a noun sense mainly confined to the idiom on the loose, which means at large. When you need a verb meaning to partially release or to relaxloosen is usually the best choice.



Lose four games in a row in the NFL and you’re pretty much finished. [Wall Street Journal]

Because I was so young and so skint I didn’t have much to lose when I first came to London. [Guardian]


If loose lending and over-borrowing didn’t cause the housing bubble, what did? [CNBC]

Just imagine what the company’s already cluttered competitive landscape would be like if HBO Go were loosed on the world as a standalone product? [Variety]

Attorneys have pressed that police should have alerted their force sooner to the possibility of a suspect on the loose marked with blood. [Roanoke Times]

7 thoughts on “Loose vs. lose”

  1. Why is this such a common mistake? I am by no means a scholar when it comes to grammar, but this the one that just drives me crazy every time I see it online.


Leave a Comment