Impassable vs. impassible

Something that is impassable is impossible to pass, cross, or overcome. Impassible originally had a different definition—namely, not subject to suffering, pain, or harm—but today it is rarely used in that sense and is commonly used in place of impassable. 

3 thoughts on “Impassable vs. impassible”

  1. “In fact, in our research, we were unable to find any instances of **impassable** used in its original sense.”

    I believe you have proven your point (involuntarily?).

    Reply
  2. i’m struggling to understand the original definition of impassible — can someone think of an example sentence? might it be something like ‘when the fortress was invaded the horses in the stables were impassible’? that sounds kindof weird?

    Reply

Leave a Comment