Toward vs. towards

Toward and towards are equally acceptable forms of the word primarily meaning in the direction of. Other than the at the end, there is no difference between them. Some people differentiate the two words in various ways, but these preferences are not borne out in the usage of most English speakers. Neither form is more formal or informal or more or less logical than the other (the Oxford English Dictionary says towards is more colloquial in British English, but we see no evidence that this is true in 21st-century British writing), so you’re safe using the one that sounds better to you.

But while both these directional words are used in all varieties of English, toward is preferred in American and Canadian English, while towards is preferred in varieties of English from outside North America. These are not rules, however, and exceptions are easily found.


Toward is the older form. It comes from the Old English tóweard, which meant roughly the same as our modern toward.1 Towards is also old, however, as for many centuries the suffixes –ward and –wards have been more or less interchangeable and have given rise to parallel forms of many words—for example, backward and backwards, and forward and forwards.2 Towards became the dominant form in the 17th century and remained ascendant until the Americans took up toward in the 19th century.

This ngram, which graphs the use of toward and towards (as a percentage of all words used) in a large number of British books and periodicals published from 1800 to 2019, shows that the latter has been heavily favored through modern times, though toward might now be gaining ground.

Toward Vs Towards Britsih English

And the next ngram shows the words’ use in American books and periodicals from the same period. It shows that the transition from the now more British towards to the now more North American toward occurred around 1900.

Toward Vs Towards American English


American and Canadian publications prefer toward, as used in these examples:

Scientists are moving toward the conclusion that the eastern cougar was erroneously classified as a separate subspecies in the first place. [NY Times]

To be sure, China is already seeing a shift away from exports toward domestic purchases as its sales to places like Europe falter. [Globe and Mail]

One inning Tuesday went a long way toward erasing any questions the Minnesota Twins might have about their closer. [USA Today]

U.K. and Australian writers heavily favor towards, by a ratio of about 10 to 1. For example, these news organizations use towards much more often than toward:

Libyan rebels advanced west towards Tripoli today after seeing off yet more airstrikes on captured cities by an increasingly desperate Colonel Gaddafi. [Daily Mail]

A few months later, towards December, they circle back completing a round trip of several hundred kilometres. [Guardian]

Scientists are moving towards the conclusion that the eastern cougar was erroneously classified as a separate subspecies in the first place. [Australian Associated Press (article now offline)]

Police began a surveillance operation and on December 23 last year saw David Smith leave his home and head towards a car. [Edinburgh Evening News (article now offline)]


24 thoughts on “Toward vs. towards”

  1. Yet another example that languages live and evolve. What is acceptable/unacceptable today may change to the opposite tomorrow. Purists should take heed….

    • You can’t say ‘color’. You NEED the ‘our’ spelling to make that pronunciation. Do you spell ‘flour’ as ‘flor’? Nope. That’s one of the best examples of how necessary the ‘u’ is.

  2. I will have to respectfully disagree with you here. I believe that any utterance or written representation of such can, and will, be assumed into a language if that is the method by witch the speakers communicate. “Your” and “you’re” are easily deciphered and distinguished contextually and since they sound identical their really is no reason to spell them differently. I mean they’re.

    • Don’t you mean there…?

      This is a good example of what Kendall was saying. There, their, they’re mean completely different things. Toward and towards do not.

  3. The days are coming, the worst chapter in the history of this land, i foresee the chaos that dissolve this land in nothingness in not less than 30 years.When every citizen has a chance of 99/100 to be a criminal, i think that society does not worth saving.We are nearing the death end we deny to accept.Everyday we see one more step towards violence,corruption,all sorts of crime and the destruction of ecology, uproot of the very foundation of this land, its origin ,cultural heritage based on unity and strength was once the living principles of our fore fathers that I am looking forward for that day for a New Kingdom.

    • Am I reading too much into your passage…you used “towards” and “forward”. Just wondering if either seemed “backward” or “backwards” to you?

  4. In British writing and speech, I see more of the ‘-wards’ endings, but there seems to be a disconnection between American speech and American writing, where a lot of people will say ‘forwards’, but it will appear in books as ‘forward’.

  5. “Towards” is a error that is so commonplace that it has become an acceptable form of the word “toward.” As acceptable as it may become over time, that does not diminish the fact that it is an error. A common error–an acceptable error to some–but an error nonetheless.

    • Marta, you are probably right, towards was probably first used in error. Although it is possible that someone intentionally misspoke the word toward because they wanted to distinguish themselves from others. I wouldn’t call that an error, I would call that an intentional change in the language (I’m sure you linguists have a name for this). Either way it matters not much, the word has been used, accepted and become even more popular than the original word – thus our language evolves.

      You got me thinking, Marta, ….I’d say that nearly every word in every language is an “error” since they have all evolved from previous words via small changes in pronunciation and/or spelling. I hadn’t thought along those lines before! What do you think?


Leave a Comment