Artefact vs. artifact

Artefact is the British spelling of the noun meaning, primarily, an object shaped by human workmanship, especially one of historical or archaeological interest. Artifact is the American spelling. Both spellings are etymologically justifiable, and both are hundreds of years old in English. The British preference for artefact is a new development. The two forms vied for ascendancy in British writing through much of the 20th century until artefact finally gained the upper hand around 1990. The following ngram, which graphs the use of artefact and artifact in a large number of British books and periodicals published from 1900 to 2019, renders the story in visual form:

Artefact Vs Artifact British English

The corresponding graph for American publications is much more straightforward:

Artefact Vs Artifact American English

Canadian writers tend to use the American spelling. Artefact is more common everywhere outside North America.


These examples are from American and Canadian publications:

The sudden suicide of an artifact-dealer with ties to the cult draws the attention of an ambitious female police detective-inspector. [Wall Street Journal]

Buried artifacts, preserved in the ashes, are coming to light. [Montreal Gazette]

One artifact of Obama’s “leading from behind” foreign policy is a sense that many of our allies had it coming … [National Review Online]

And these are from outside North America:

Some bandits had made off with a golden artefact owned by the local storekeeper and with the aid of a new found ally … [Guardian]

€310k – The price of the most expensive oriental artefact ever sold at auction in Ireland. [Irish Times]

The best-known artefact is the teenage monarch’s gold funerary mask, which stares out from a case on the first floor of the museum. [The Age (Australia)]


1. “Artifact” at Etymology Online ^
2. ^

Other resources

“Artefact versus Artifact” on World Wide Words

7 thoughts on “Artefact vs. artifact”

  1. Who knew? I had to look this up after my spell-checker complained of my use of the form “artifact”. As a biologist and software engineer I use the word frequently. Thanks for the info!

  2. We were taught in grade school that Artifact was a thing, and an Artefact was a constructed idea… does that have any validity?

  3. “The British preference for artefact is a new development”

    haha…Brits trying to grasp at anything to stay relevant..

    • Sure, because changing one letter of a word makes a culture relevant. That must be why, over the course of decades, it has slowly shifted in spelling.

      Speaking of grasping – your silly comment was a desperate grasp at attention. Well, here you are: attention, just for you – albeit slightly bored and patronising attention. Be sure to say thank you.


Leave a Comment